0
selected
-
1.
Efficacy of the adjuvanted subunit protein COVID-19 vaccine, SCB-2019: a phase 2 and 3 multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Bravo, L, Smolenov, I, Han, HH, Li, P, Hosain, R, Rockhold, F, Clemens, SAC, Roa, C, Borja-Tabora, C, Quinsaat, A, et al
Lancet (London, England). 2022;(10323):461-472
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND A range of safe and effective vaccines against SARS CoV 2 are needed to address the COVID 19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine SCB-2019. METHODS This ongoing phase 2 and 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was done in adults aged 18 years and older who were in good health or with a stable chronic health condition, at 31 sites in five countries (Belgium, Brazil, Colombia, Philippines, and South Africa). The participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using a centralised internet randomisation system to receive two 0·5 mL intramuscular doses of SCB-2019 (30 μg, adjuvanted with 1·50 mg CpG-1018 and 0·75 mg alum) or placebo (0·9% sodium chloride for injection supplied in 10 mL ampoules) 21 days apart. All study staff and participants were masked, but vaccine administrators were not. Primary endpoints were vaccine efficacy, measured by RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 of any severity with onset from 14 days after the second dose in baseline SARS-CoV-2 seronegative participants (the per-protocol population), and the safety and solicited local and systemic adverse events in the phase 2 subset. This study is registered on EudraCT (2020-004272-17) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04672395). FINDINGS 30 174 participants were enrolled from March 24, 2021, until the cutoff date of Aug 10, 2021, of whom 30 128 received their first assigned vaccine (n=15 064) or a placebo injection (n=15 064). The per-protocol population consisted of 12 355 baseline SARS-CoV-2-naive participants (6251 vaccinees and 6104 placebo recipients). Most exclusions (13 389 [44·4%]) were because of seropositivity at baseline. There were 207 confirmed per-protocol cases of COVID-19 at 14 days after the second dose, 52 vaccinees versus 155 placebo recipients, and an overall vaccine efficacy against any severity COVID-19 of 67·2% (95·72% CI 54·3-76·8), 83·7% (97·86% CI 55·9-95·4) against moderate-to-severe COVID-19, and 100% (97·86% CI 25·3-100·0) against severe COVID-19. All COVID-19 cases were due to virus variants; vaccine efficacy against any severity COVID-19 due to the three predominant variants was 78·7% (95% CI 57·3-90·4) for delta, 91·8% (44·9-99·8) for gamma, and 58·6% (13·3-81·5) for mu. No safety issues emerged in the follow-up period for the efficacy analysis (median of 82 days [IQR 63-103]). The vaccine elicited higher rates of mainly mild-to-moderate injection site pain than the placebo after the first (35·7% [287 of 803] vs 10·3% [81 of 786]) and second (26·9% [189 of 702] vs 7·4% [52 of 699]) doses, but the rates of other solicited local and systemic adverse events were similar between the groups. INTERPRETATION Two doses of SCB-2019 vaccine plus CpG and alum provides notable protection against the entire severity spectrum of COVID-19 caused by circulating SAR-CoV-2 viruses, including the predominating delta variant. FUNDING Clover Biopharmaceuticals and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.
-
2.
Safety, tolerability and efficacy of indacaterol, a novel once-daily beta(2)-agonist, in patients with COPD: a 28-day randomised, placebo controlled clinical trial.
Beier, J, Chanez, P, Martinot, JB, Schreurs, AJ, Tkácová, R, Bao, W, Jack, D, Higgins, M
Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2007;(6):740-9
Abstract
In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) classified as moderate onwards, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Guidelines recommend regular treatment with one or more long-acting bronchodilators, such as beta(2)-agonists or anticholinergics. In contrast to currently available long-acting beta(2)-agonists, which have a duration of action of 12 h, indacaterol has demonstrated effective 24-h bronchodilation on once-daily dosing. A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study was conducted to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of indacaterol with that of placebo, over a 28-day period, in patients with moderate COPD (as defined by GOLD 2001 criteria; equivalent to moderate-to-severe COPD in the GOLD 2005 criteria). Patients were randomised 2:2:1 to receive indacaterol 400 microg or 800 microg or placebo once-daily (between 07:00 and 11:00 h) via a single-dose dry-powder inhaler for 28 days. Assessments included monitoring of adverse events (AEs), blood chemistry (including serum potassium and blood glucose), vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate), electrocardiograms and spirometry. One hundred and sixty-three patients were randomised, with 155 (95%) completing the study. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in the overall incidence of AEs, with AEs reported by 35%, 51% and 25% of patients in the indacaterol 400 microg, 800 microg and placebo groups, respectively. The majority of AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and there were no study-drug related serious AEs. There were no statistically significant differences between indacaterol groups and placebo in mean pulse rate and QTc interval, and isolated statistically significant (p<0.05) treatment-placebo differences in mean blood pressure, blood glucose and serum potassium. There was a statistically significant improvement in FEV(1) vs placebo at all post-baseline timepoints for both indacaterol treatment groups; 30 min post-dose, adjusted mean+/-SE FEV(1) indacaterol-placebo differences were: Day 1, 220+/-36 ml and 210+/-36 ml; Day 14, 320+/-50 ml and 270+/-50 ml; Day 28, 260+/-61 ml and 200+/-61 ml for 400 and 800 microg, respectively (all p<0.01 vs placebo). Bronchodilation was still apparent after 24h, with pre-dose (i.e. trough) adjusted mean+/-SE FEV(1) indacaterol-placebo differences of: Day 14, 230+/-44 ml and 210+/-44 ml; Day 28, 220+/-49 ml and 210+/-49 ml for indacaterol 400 and 800 microg, respectively (all p<0.0001 vs placebo). Once-daily indacaterol was well tolerated at doses up to 800 microg with a good overall safety profile. There was no statistical difference at any dose between the safety of indacaterol and placebo. Furthermore, this study supports the previously demonstrated 24-h bronchodilator efficacy of indacaterol.
-
3.
Tolerability of indacaterol, a novel once-daily beta2-agonist, in patients with asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled, 28-day safety study.
Yang, WH, Martinot, JB, Pohunek, P, Beier, J, Magula, D, Cameron, R, Owen, R, Higgins, M
Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. 2007;(6):555-61
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, once-daily beta2-agonist. OBJECTIVE To investigate the safety and tolerability of indacaterol at doses of 400 and 800 microg/d. METHODS Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, 28-day study. Patients with persistent asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] > or =-60% predicted, < or =1,600 microg of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent daily) received indacaterol, 400 microg (n = 59) or 800 microg (n = 59), or placebo (n = 26) once daily via a single-dose dry powder inhaler. Safety assessments were performed before and after dosing on days 1, 14, and 28, with particular attention to key beta2-agonist safety variables. RESULTS A total of 144 patients were randomized, with 135 (93.8%) completing the study. Indacaterol was well tolerated: the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the active and placebo groups, and AEs, when they occurred, were mild or moderate for most (98.2%). There was no dose-response relationship between indacaterol and the incidence of AEs (400 microg, 40.7%; 800 microg, 37.3%; and placebo, 38.5%). Few AEs considered as beta2-agonist class effects occurred (none leading to withdrawal). Small differences between indacaterol and placebo in mean serum potassium (< or =-0.29 mmol/L) and glucose (< or =0.93 mmol/L) levels were occasionally statistically significant (P < .05) but not regarded as clinically meaningful. As expected for a beta2-agonist, there was some indication of a trend in QTc prolongation with increasing exposure (maximum mean change, 8.9 milliseconds; P < .05 vs placebo). Significant increases in FEV1 (P < .05) were seen at all postbaseline time points for both indacaterol doses vs placebo, with indacaterol-placebo differences 30 minutes after dosing of 0.21 to 0.25 L and before dosing on days 14 and 28 (approximately 24 hours after the previous dose) of 0.15 to 0.23 L. CONCLUSION Indacaterol had a good overall safety profile and was well tolerated at both doses, with predose FEV1 results on days 14 and 28 indicating 24-hour bronchodilator efficacy.
-
4.
A comparative study of clarithromycin modified release and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.
Martinot, JB, Carr, WD, Cullen, S, Heredia Budo, JL, Bauer, K, MacLeod, C, Sanguinetti, CM, van Veldhuizen, WC, ,
Advances in therapy. 2001;(1):1-11
Abstract
This phase III, investigator-blind, randomized, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and tolerability of clarithromycin modified release (MR) with those of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in 250 adult outpatients with acute exacerbationof chronic bronchitis (AECB). Patients received either clarithromycin MR 500 mg once daily or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 500 mg/125 mg three times daily for 7 days. Primary endpoints were sponsor-defined clinical response and pathogen outcome at the end of treatment. Secondary endpoints were sponsor-defined clinical response and pathogen outcome at study end, investigator-defined clinical response at end of treatment and end of study, resolution or improvement of signs and symptoms, eradication of baseline pathogens, serologic outcome for atypical pathogens, and occurrence of reinfection and superinfection. Adverse events and compliance were also evaluated. Clinical and bacteriologic outcomes with both treatments for all endpoints were statistically equivalent, as were total adverse events, although the incidences of digestive disturbances (13% vs 4%) and discontinuations due to adverse events (8 vs 2 patients; P < or =.05) were significantly higher with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Ninety-five percent of patients receiving clarithromycin MR and 80% receiving amoxicillin/clavulanic acid were 100% compliant with medication (P < or =.05). Clarithromycin MR and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid are both well tolerated and effective as therapy for AECB; however, clarithromycin produced fewer side effects and discontinuations and higher compliance rates.